|
Appointing Consultants and Contractors |
1. |
Q: |
Is it against the law if Ken and Tung conspire to rig the tender through the submission of tenders from five different companies? |
|
|
|
|
|
A: |
|
|
2. |
Q: |
Ken reduces the consulting fees to $180,000, to save the OC the "trouble" of having to conduct an open tender exercise. To which ordinance is this related? |
|
|
|
|
|
A: |
|
|
3. |
Q: |
Raymond fails to disclose his relationship with his father-in-law Tung to the OC and even negotiates the contract price with Tung together with Ken. Which rule is being violated? |
|
|
|
|
|
A: |
|
|
|
Supervising Maintenance Works |
4. |
Q: |
Mr LAU, inspector of works from Ken's consultancy firm, gambles and goes to the Mainland for entertainment with the workers of the contractor and Mr CHAU of the building's management office. Does it violate any law? |
|
|
|
|
|
A: |
|
|
5. |
Q: |
Tung has paid Raymond's share of the renovation project fees. Can he use his relationship as a relative of Raymond as an excuse under the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance? |
|
|
|
|
|
A: |
|
|
6. |
Q: |
Tung asks Raymond to arrange for the OC to approve the interim payment as soon as possible. Which section of the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance may be breached? |
|
|
|
|
|
A: |
|
|
7. |
Q: |
Which ordinance will be violated if an advantage is offered to staff of Buildings Department during inspection? |
|
|
|
|
|
A: |
|
|